chemical: be find in grind

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ingredient
Weight: 0.63
, commodity
Weight: 0.59
, dirt
Weight: 0.59
, substance
Weight: 0.58
Siblings sulfuric acid
Weight: 0.79
, hydrogen peroxide
Weight: 0.75
, carbon monoxide
Weight: 0.74
, ammonia
Weight: 0.72
, hydrogen sulphide
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
be find in grind 1.00
be at grind 0.95
be at on grind 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(dirt, be at on grind)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(chemical, be find in grind)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(dirt, be at grind)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(chemical, be find in grind)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(chemical, be find in grind)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(dirt, be at grind)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(chemical, be find in grind)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(dirt, be at on grind)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(chemical, be find in grind)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dirt, be at grind)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(chemical, be find in grind)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(dirt, be at on grind)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(dirt, be at grind)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(chemical, be find in grind)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(chemical, be find in grind)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(dirt, be at on grind)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(chemical, be find in grind)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(chemical, be find in grind)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(chemical, be find in grind)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(chemical, be find in grind)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(chemical, be find in grind)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(chemical, be find in grind)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(chemical, be find in grind)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(chemical, be find in grind)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(chemical, be find in grind)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(chemical, be find in grind)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(dirt, be at on grind)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(chemical, be find in grind)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(dirt, be at grind)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(chemical, be find in grind)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(dirt, be at on grind)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(chemical, be find in grind)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(dirt, be at grind)