chemical: has quality change

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chemical compound
Weight: 0.71
, hazard
Weight: 0.66
, ingredient
Weight: 0.63
, chemical weapon
Weight: 0.62
Siblings sulfuric acid
Weight: 0.79
, ethylene glycol
Weight: 0.78
, sulfur dioxide
Weight: 0.77
, ammonium nitrate
Weight: 0.77
, boric acid
Weight: 0.76

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality change 1.00
has quality good 0.86
has quality bad 0.86
is quality 0.84
has quality worse 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chemical, has quality change)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chemical, has quality change)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(chemical, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(chemical, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(chemical, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(chemical, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(chemical, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(sulfur dioxide, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(chemical, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(ethylene glycol, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(chemical, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(chemical, has quality change)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(chemical, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(chemical, has quality change)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(chemical, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(ethylene glycol, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(ethylene glycol, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(chemical, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(sulfur dioxide, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sulfur dioxide, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(chemical, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(chemical, has quality change)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(chemical, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chemical, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(chemical, has quality change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(chemical, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chemical, has quality change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(chemical, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(chemical, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality worse)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(chemical, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(ethylene glycol, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(chemical, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(sulfur dioxide, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(chemical, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(chemical, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality worse)