chemicals: be better than organic fertilizers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.56
, company
Weight: 0.56
, manufacturer
Weight: 0.48
, business
Weight: 0.48
, sector
Weight: 0.41
Siblings chemical plant
Weight: 0.33
, oil company
Weight: 0.32
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.32
, software company
Weight: 0.32
, packaging
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than organic fertilizers 1.00
be used in agriculture 0.78
be used in growing vegetables 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chemicals, be better than organic fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(chemicals, be better than organic fertilizers)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chemicals, be better than organic fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(chemicals, be used in growing vegetables)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(chemicals, be better than organic fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(chemicals, be used in growing vegetables)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(chemicals, be better than organic fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be used in growing vegetables)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(chemicals, be better than organic fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(chemicals, be used in growing vegetables)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(chemicals, be better than organic fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(chemicals, be used in agriculture)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chemicals, be better than organic fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(chemicals, be used in agriculture)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(chemicals, be better than organic fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(chemicals, be used in agriculture)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(chemicals, be better than organic fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be used in agriculture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(chemicals, be better than organic fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(chemicals, be better than organic fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be better than organic fertilizers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chemicals, be better than organic fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(chemicals, be better than organic fertilizers)