chemicals: be toxic to human

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.56
, company
Weight: 0.56
, manufacturer
Weight: 0.48
, business
Weight: 0.48
, sector
Weight: 0.41
Siblings chemical plant
Weight: 0.33
, oil company
Weight: 0.32
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.32
, software company
Weight: 0.32
, packaging
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be toxic to human 1.00
is toxic 0.93
be harmful 0.78
be harmful for environment 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chemicals, be toxic to human)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(chemicals, be toxic to human)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(chemicals, be toxic to human)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(chemicals, be harmful for environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(chemicals, be toxic to human)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chemicals, is toxic)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chemicals, be toxic to human)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(chemicals, be harmful for environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(chemicals, be toxic to human)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, is toxic)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(chemicals, be toxic to human)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(chemicals, be harmful)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chemicals, be toxic to human)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(chemicals, is toxic)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(chemicals, be toxic to human)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(chemicals, is toxic)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chemicals, be toxic to human)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(chemicals, be harmful)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(chemicals, be toxic to human)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(chemicals, be harmful for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(chemicals, be toxic to human)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(chemicals, be harmful)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(chemicals, be toxic to human)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be harmful)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(chemicals, be toxic to human)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be harmful for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(chemicals, be toxic to human)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(chemicals, be toxic to human)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be toxic to human)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chemicals, be toxic to human)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(chemicals, be toxic to human)