chen: have high winrate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.49
, student
Weight: 0.47
, scientist
Weight: 0.42
Siblings sam
Weight: 0.30
, john locke
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
have high winrate 1.00
have high winrate against pudge 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(chen, have high winrate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(chen, have high winrate)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(chen, have high winrate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chen, have high winrate against pudge)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(chen, have high winrate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(chen, have high winrate against pudge)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(chen, have high winrate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(chen, have high winrate against pudge)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(chen, have high winrate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chen, have high winrate against pudge)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(chen, have high winrate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(chen, have high winrate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(chen, have high winrate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(chen, have high winrate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(chen, have high winrate)