cherokee: was important tribe in california

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents native american
Weight: 0.61
, tribe
Weight: 0.56
, name
Weight: 0.56
, north america
Weight: 0.55
, town
Weight: 0.54
Siblings south america
Weight: 0.34
, george washington
Weight: 0.34
, latin america
Weight: 0.34
, central america
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important tribe in california 1.00
were viewed differently than tribes 0.77
were viewed differently than other tribes 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(cherokee, was important tribe in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(cherokee, was important tribe in california)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(cherokee, was important tribe in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cherokee, were viewed differently than tribes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(cherokee, was important tribe in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cherokee, were viewed differently than other tribes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(cherokee, was important tribe in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(cherokee, were viewed differently than tribes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(cherokee, was important tribe in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(cherokee, were viewed differently than other tribes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(cherokee, was important tribe in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cherokee, were viewed differently than tribes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(cherokee, was important tribe in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(cherokee, were viewed differently than other tribes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(cherokee, was important tribe in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cherokee, were viewed differently than other tribes)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(cherokee, was important tribe in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cherokee, were viewed differently than tribes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(cherokee, was important tribe in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cherokee, was important tribe in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(cherokee, was important tribe in california)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(cherokee, was important tribe in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cherokee, was important tribe in california)