cherokee: were viewed differently than other tribes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents native american
Weight: 0.61
, tribe
Weight: 0.56
, name
Weight: 0.56
, north america
Weight: 0.55
, town
Weight: 0.54
Siblings south america
Weight: 0.34
, george washington
Weight: 0.34
, latin america
Weight: 0.34
, central america
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
were viewed differently than other tribes 1.00
were viewed differently than tribes 1.00
was important tribe in california 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(cherokee, were viewed differently than other tribes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(cherokee, were viewed differently than other tribes)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(cherokee, were viewed differently than other tribes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(cherokee, were viewed differently than tribes)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(cherokee, were viewed differently than other tribes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cherokee, were viewed differently than tribes)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(cherokee, were viewed differently than other tribes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cherokee, were viewed differently than tribes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cherokee, were viewed differently than other tribes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cherokee, were viewed differently than tribes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(cherokee, were viewed differently than other tribes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(cherokee, was important tribe in california)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(cherokee, were viewed differently than other tribes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cherokee, was important tribe in california)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(cherokee, were viewed differently than other tribes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cherokee, was important tribe in california)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cherokee, were viewed differently than other tribes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(cherokee, was important tribe in california)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(cherokee, were viewed differently than other tribes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cherokee, were viewed differently than other tribes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cherokee, were viewed differently than other tribes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(cherokee, were viewed differently than other tribes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cherokee, were viewed differently than other tribes)