cherry tree: has physical part zone

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tree
Weight: 0.86
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.80
, flower
Weight: 0.66
Siblings apple tree
Weight: 0.44
, peach tree
Weight: 0.44
, pear tree
Weight: 0.43
, maple tree
Weight: 0.42
, oak tree
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part zone 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(fruit tree, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cherry tree, has physical part zone)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cherry tree, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(fruit tree, has physical part zone)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cherry tree, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fruit tree, has physical part zone)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cherry tree, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, has physical part zone)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cherry tree, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(pear tree, has physical part zone)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cherry tree, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, has physical part zone)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cherry tree, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, has physical part zone)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(fruit tree, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(cherry tree, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(cherry tree, has physical part zone)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cherry tree, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(oak tree, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(oak tree, has physical part zone)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cherry tree, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(pear tree, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(pear tree, has physical part zone)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cherry tree, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(apple tree, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(apple tree, has physical part zone)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cherry tree, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(maple tree, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(maple tree, has physical part zone)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cherry tree, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(cherry tree, has physical part zone)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(cherry tree, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cherry tree, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cherry tree, has physical part zone)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cherry tree, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cherry tree, has physical part zone)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cherry tree, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fruit tree, has physical part zone)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cherry tree, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(oak tree, has physical part zone)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cherry tree, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(apple tree, has physical part zone)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cherry tree, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pear tree, has physical part zone)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cherry tree, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(maple tree, has physical part zone)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(cherry tree, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fruit tree, has physical part zone)