cherry: was mean to dally

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit tree
Weight: 0.72
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.69
, wood
Weight: 0.65
, apple
Weight: 0.65
, hardwood
Weight: 0.63
Siblings cherry tree
Weight: 0.41
, apple tree
Weight: 0.39
, peach tree
Weight: 0.38
, pear tree
Weight: 0.38
, pear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
was mean to dally 1.00
was mean dally according 0.94
be attracted to dally 0.91
was mean dally according to boy 0.89
be afraid of loving dally 0.87
admire dally in book 0.86
was mean dally according to pony boy 0.85
dally according to boy 0.85
dally according to pony boy 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cherry, was mean to dally)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(cherry, was mean to dally)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(cherry, was mean to dally)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(cherry, be afraid of loving dally)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(cherry, was mean to dally)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(cherry, be attracted to dally)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(cherry, was mean to dally)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(cherry, admire dally in book)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(cherry, was mean to dally)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(cherry, dally according to boy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(cherry, was mean to dally)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(cherry, was mean dally according to pony boy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(cherry, was mean to dally)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cherry, be afraid of loving dally)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cherry, was mean to dally)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(cherry, be afraid of loving dally)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(cherry, was mean to dally)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cherry, dally according to boy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(cherry, was mean to dally)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(cherry, was mean dally according to pony boy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(cherry, was mean to dally)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cherry, be afraid of loving dally)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(cherry, was mean to dally)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(cherry, be attracted to dally)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cherry, was mean to dally)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(cherry, be attracted to dally)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(cherry, was mean to dally)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(cherry, be attracted to dally)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(cherry, was mean to dally)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cherry, admire dally in book)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cherry, was mean to dally)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(cherry, admire dally in book)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(cherry, was mean to dally)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cherry, admire dally in book)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(cherry, was mean to dally)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(cherry, dally according to boy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(cherry, was mean to dally)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(cherry, was mean dally according to pony boy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cherry, was mean to dally)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(cherry, was mean dally according to pony boy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cherry, was mean to dally)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(cherry, dally according to boy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(cherry, was mean to dally)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cherry, was mean to dally)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cherry, was mean to dally)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cherry, was mean to dally)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cherry, was mean to dally)