cherry: were at alone movie

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit tree
Weight: 0.72
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.69
, wood
Weight: 0.65
, apple
Weight: 0.65
, hardwood
Weight: 0.63
Siblings cherry tree
Weight: 0.41
, apple tree
Weight: 0.39
, peach tree
Weight: 0.38
, pear tree
Weight: 0.38
, pear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
were at alone movie 1.00
were at movie 0.92
be in alone drive in 0.82
were at alone nightly double 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cherry, were at alone movie)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(cherry, were at alone movie)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(cherry, were at alone movie)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(cherry, were at movie)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cherry, were at alone movie)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cherry, were at movie)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cherry, were at alone movie)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(cherry, were at movie)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(cherry, were at alone movie)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(cherry, were at movie)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(cherry, were at alone movie)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cherry, be in alone drive in)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(cherry, were at alone movie)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cherry, were at alone nightly double)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cherry, were at alone movie)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(cherry, be in alone drive in)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cherry, were at alone movie)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cherry, were at alone nightly double)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cherry, were at alone movie)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cherry, were at alone nightly double)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(cherry, were at alone movie)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(cherry, be in alone drive in)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(cherry, were at alone movie)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(cherry, were at alone nightly double)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cherry, were at alone movie)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cherry, be in alone drive in)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(cherry, were at alone movie)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cherry, were at alone movie)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cherry, were at alone movie)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cherry, were at alone movie)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cherry, were at alone movie)