cherry: were at alone nightly double

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit tree
Weight: 0.72
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.69
, wood
Weight: 0.65
, apple
Weight: 0.65
, hardwood
Weight: 0.63
Siblings cherry tree
Weight: 0.41
, apple tree
Weight: 0.39
, peach tree
Weight: 0.38
, pear tree
Weight: 0.38
, pear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
were at alone nightly double 1.00
were at alone movie 0.79
be in alone drive in 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cherry, were at alone nightly double)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(cherry, were at alone nightly double)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(cherry, were at alone nightly double)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(cherry, were at alone movie)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(cherry, were at alone nightly double)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cherry, were at alone movie)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cherry, were at alone nightly double)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(cherry, were at alone movie)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(cherry, were at alone nightly double)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cherry, were at alone movie)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(cherry, were at alone nightly double)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cherry, be in alone drive in)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(cherry, were at alone nightly double)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(cherry, be in alone drive in)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cherry, were at alone nightly double)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(cherry, be in alone drive in)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(cherry, were at alone nightly double)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cherry, be in alone drive in)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(cherry, were at alone nightly double)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cherry, were at alone nightly double)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cherry, were at alone nightly double)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cherry, were at alone nightly double)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cherry, were at alone nightly double)