chess board: be at park

Related concepts

Parents	game Weight: 0.59 , item Weight: 0.59 , example Weight: 0.45 , piece Weight: 0.38
Siblings	chess piece Weight: 0.36 , chess set Weight: 0.36 , table tennis Weight: 0.34 , tennis game Weight: 0.34 , chess player Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be at park	1.00
be used to recreation	0.76
be play for recreation	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(game, be play for recreation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(chess board, be at park)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(chess board, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(game, be play for recreation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(chess board, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(game, be play for recreation)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(chess board, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(tennis game, be at park)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(chess board, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(tennis game, be used to recreation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(game, be play for recreation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(chess board, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(chess board, be at park)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(chess board, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(tennis game, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(tennis game, be at park)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(chess board, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(tennis game, be used to recreation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(tennis game, be used to recreation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(chess board, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Salient(chess board, be at park)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

Salient(chess board, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(chess board, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(chess board, be at park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(chess board, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(chess board, be at park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(chess board, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(game, be play for recreation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(chess board, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(tennis game, be at park)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(chess board, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(tennis game, be used to recreation)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.64

Typical(chess board, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(game, be play for recreation)