chess player: be at coffee shop

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.52
, woman
Weight: 0.48
, sport
Weight: 0.47
, athlete
Weight: 0.46
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.35
, tennis player
Weight: 0.35
, football game
Weight: 0.35
, tennis game
Weight: 0.35
, football player
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at coffee shop 1.00
be at store 0.77
like chocolate 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(game, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(chess player, be at coffee shop)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(woman, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(chess player, be at coffee shop)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(chess player, be at coffee shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(woman, be at store)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(chess player, be at coffee shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(game, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chess player, be at coffee shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(woman, be at store)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chess player, be at coffee shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(game, be at store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(game, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(chess player, be at coffee shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(chess player, be at coffee shop)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(woman, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(chess player, be at coffee shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(chess player, be at coffee shop)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(chess player, be at coffee shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(chess player, be at coffee shop)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(chess player, be at coffee shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(chess player, be at coffee shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chess player, be at coffee shop)

Typical implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(chess player, be at coffee shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(chess player, be at coffee shop)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chess player, be at coffee shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(game, be at store)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chess player, be at coffee shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(woman, be at store)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(chess player, be at coffee shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(game, be at store)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(chess player, be at coffee shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(woman, be at store)