chess player: feel force to do some study

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.52
, woman
Weight: 0.48
, sport
Weight: 0.47
, athlete
Weight: 0.46
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.35
, tennis player
Weight: 0.35
, football game
Weight: 0.35
, tennis game
Weight: 0.35
, football player
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
feel force to do some study 1.00
think 0.78
think to rest 0.78
be hard to understand than men 0.77
be worry about her shape and wieght 0.76
eat less food than men do 0.76
dare men into do stupid thing 0.76
be used to get in shape 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(woman, eat less food than men do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(chess player, feel force to do some study)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(woman, think) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(chess player, feel force to do some study)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(chess player, feel force to do some study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(woman, think)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(chess player, feel force to do some study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(woman, eat less food than men do)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(chess player, feel force to do some study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(woman, eat less food than men do)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(chess player, feel force to do some study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(woman, think)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(chess player, feel force to do some study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(tennis game, be used to get in shape)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(woman, think) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(chess player, feel force to do some study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(chess player, feel force to do some study)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(woman, eat less food than men do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(chess player, feel force to do some study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(chess player, feel force to do some study)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(chess player, feel force to do some study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(tennis game, be used to get in shape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(tennis game, be used to get in shape)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(chess player, feel force to do some study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(chess player, feel force to do some study)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(chess player, feel force to do some study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(chess player, feel force to do some study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(chess player, feel force to do some study)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(chess player, feel force to do some study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(chess player, feel force to do some study)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(chess player, feel force to do some study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(woman, think)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(chess player, feel force to do some study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(woman, eat less food than men do)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(chess player, feel force to do some study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(tennis game, be used to get in shape)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(chess player, feel force to do some study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(woman, think)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(chess player, feel force to do some study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(woman, eat less food than men do)