chess: be considered stratigy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.64
, board game
Weight: 0.60
, sport
Weight: 0.58
, competition
Weight: 0.58
, activity
Weight: 0.58
Siblings chess set
Weight: 0.37
, tennis
Weight: 0.34
, badminton
Weight: 0.34
, table tennis
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered stratigy 1.00
be considered sport 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chess, be considered stratigy)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tennis, be considered sport)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(chess, be considered stratigy)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(tennis, be considered sport)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(tennis, be considered sport)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(chess, be considered stratigy)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(chess, be considered stratigy)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(chess, be considered stratigy)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(chess, be considered sport)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(chess, be considered stratigy)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(chess, be considered sport)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(chess, be considered stratigy)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(chess, be considered sport)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(chess, be considered stratigy)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(chess, be considered sport)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(chess, be considered stratigy)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(chess, be considered stratigy)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chess, be considered stratigy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(chess, be considered stratigy)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(chess, be considered stratigy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chess, be considered stratigy)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(tennis, be considered sport)