chess: be like life

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.64
, board game
Weight: 0.60
, sport
Weight: 0.58
, competition
Weight: 0.58
, activity
Weight: 0.58
Siblings chess set
Weight: 0.37
, tennis
Weight: 0.34
, badminton
Weight: 0.34
, table tennis
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be like life 1.00
be like war 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sport, be like war)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(chess, be like life)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chess, be like life)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(sport, be like war)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chess, be like life)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(sport, be like war)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sport, be like war)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chess, be like life)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(chess, be like life)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chess, be like life)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(chess, be like life)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(chess, be like life)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(chess, be like war)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(chess, be like life)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chess, be like war)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chess, be like life)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(chess, be like war)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chess, be like life)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(chess, be like war)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(chess, be like life)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(chess, be like life)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chess, be like life)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chess, be like life)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(chess, be like life)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chess, be like life)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(sport, be like war)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(chess, be like life)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(sport, be like war)