chess: be similar to object used for same purpose today

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.64
, board game
Weight: 0.60
, sport
Weight: 0.58
, competition
Weight: 0.58
, activity
Weight: 0.58
Siblings chess set
Weight: 0.37
, tennis
Weight: 0.34
, badminton
Weight: 0.34
, table tennis
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be similar to object used for same purpose today 1.00
be same 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(chess, be similar to object used for same purpose today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(tennis, be same)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chess, be similar to object used for same purpose today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(tennis, be same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(tennis, be same)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chess, be similar to object used for same purpose today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(chess, be similar to object used for same purpose today)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(chess, be similar to object used for same purpose today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chess, be same)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(chess, be similar to object used for same purpose today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(chess, be same)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chess, be similar to object used for same purpose today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chess, be same)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(chess, be similar to object used for same purpose today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(chess, be same)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(chess, be similar to object used for same purpose today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(chess, be similar to object used for same purpose today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(chess, be similar to object used for same purpose today)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chess, be similar to object used for same purpose today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(chess, be similar to object used for same purpose today)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(chess, be similar to object used for same purpose today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tennis, be same)