chess: become more interesting

Related concepts

Parents	hobby Weight: 0.64 , board game Weight: 0.60 , sport Weight: 0.58 , competition Weight: 0.58 , activity Weight: 0.58
Siblings	chess set Weight: 0.37 , tennis Weight: 0.34 , badminton Weight: 0.34 , table tennis Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
become more interesting	1.00
is interesting	0.90
is more popular	0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(chess, become more interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(badminton, is interesting)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(chess, become more interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(tennis, is interesting)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(chess, become more interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(tennis, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(tennis, is interesting)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(chess, become more interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(badminton, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(badminton, is interesting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(chess, become more interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(chess, become more interesting)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(chess, become more interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(chess, is interesting)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(chess, become more interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(chess, is interesting)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(chess, become more interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(chess, is more popular)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(chess, become more interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(chess, is interesting)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(chess, become more interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(chess, is interesting)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(chess, become more interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(chess, is more popular)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(chess, become more interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(chess, is more popular)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(chess, become more interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(chess, is more popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(chess, become more interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(chess, become more interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(chess, become more interesting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(chess, become more interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(chess, become more interesting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(chess, become more interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(tennis, is interesting)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(chess, become more interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(badminton, is interesting)