chess: was named

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.64
, board game
Weight: 0.60
, sport
Weight: 0.58
, competition
Weight: 0.58
, activity
Weight: 0.58
Siblings chess set
Weight: 0.37
, tennis
Weight: 0.34
, badminton
Weight: 0.34
, table tennis
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was named 1.00
is pieces named 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(chess, was named)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(chess, was named)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(chess, was named)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(chess, is pieces named)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(chess, was named)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(chess, is pieces named)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(chess, was named)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(chess, is pieces named)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(chess, was named)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chess, is pieces named)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(chess, was named)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(chess, was named)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chess, was named)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(chess, was named)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(chess, was named)