chewing gum: be bad for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings gum
Weight: 0.60
, eating apple
Weight: 0.33
, banana peel
Weight: 0.32
, eating
Weight: 0.32
, glue stick
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for dogs 1.00
be bad for teeth 0.78
be good for teeth 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(chewing gum, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(chewing gum, be bad for dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad for teeth)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(chewing gum, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(chewing gum, be bad for teeth)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(chewing gum, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be bad for teeth)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(chewing gum, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, be bad for teeth)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be good for teeth)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(chewing gum, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be good for teeth)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(chewing gum, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, be good for teeth)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(chewing gum, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(chewing gum, be good for teeth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(chewing gum, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(chewing gum, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be bad for dogs)