chewing gum: be bad for health

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings gum
Weight: 0.60
, eating apple
Weight: 0.33
, banana peel
Weight: 0.32
, eating
Weight: 0.32
, glue stick
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for health 1.00
has quality bad 0.81
be bad for environment 0.80
be bad in school 0.79
has quality good 0.77
be good in school 0.75
be bad for teeth 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(eating, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(eating, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gum, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(gum, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(eating, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(eating, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(eating, be bad for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(eating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(eating, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(eating, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(eating, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(gum, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(gum, be bad for environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(gum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(gum, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(chewing gum, be bad for health)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, be bad in school)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(chewing gum, be bad in school)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be bad in school)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad in school)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be bad for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(chewing gum, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(chewing gum, be bad for environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be bad for teeth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad for environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, be bad for environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chewing gum, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be good in school)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(chewing gum, be bad for teeth)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad for teeth)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, be bad for teeth)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be good in school)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, be good in school)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(chewing gum, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(chewing gum, be good in school)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(chewing gum, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad for health)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be bad for health)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(eating, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(eating, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(gum, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(eating, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(gum, has quality bad)