chewing gum: be in class good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings gum
Weight: 0.60
, eating apple
Weight: 0.33
, banana peel
Weight: 0.32
, eating
Weight: 0.32
, glue stick
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in class good 1.00
be in class bad 0.97
be good in school 0.82
be bad in school 0.78
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(gum, be in class good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(eating, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(chewing gum, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(gum, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(gum, be in class good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(chewing gum, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(eating, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(eating, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(chewing gum, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(chewing gum, be in class good)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(chewing gum, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(chewing gum, be in class bad)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(chewing gum, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be in class bad)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(chewing gum, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, be in class bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(chewing gum, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be in class bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(chewing gum, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be good in school)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(chewing gum, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(chewing gum, be good in school)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(chewing gum, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(chewing gum, be bad in school)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(chewing gum, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, be good in school)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(chewing gum, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be bad in school)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(chewing gum, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, be bad in school)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(chewing gum, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chewing gum, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(chewing gum, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(chewing gum, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(chewing gum, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad in school)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(chewing gum, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(chewing gum, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be good in school)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(chewing gum, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(chewing gum, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be in class good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(chewing gum, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be in class good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(gum, be in class good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(eating, has quality good)