chewing gum: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings gum
Weight: 0.60
, eating apple
Weight: 0.33
, banana peel
Weight: 0.32
, eating
Weight: 0.32
, glue stick
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
be bad for health 0.77
be bad for environment 0.77
be in class good 0.76
be good in school 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(eating, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(gum, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(eating, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gum, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(gum, be in class good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(eating, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(eating, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(eating, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(eating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(eating, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(gum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(gum, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(eating, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(eating, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(gum, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(gum, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(gum, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(gum, be in class good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(chewing gum, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(chewing gum, has quality bad)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(chewing gum, has quality bad)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, has quality bad)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(chewing gum, is quality)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chewing gum, is quality)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, is quality)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(chewing gum, be bad for health)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(chewing gum, be bad for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be bad for health)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(chewing gum, be in class good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be bad for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be in class good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(chewing gum, be good in school)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, be bad for health)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be good in school)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, be in class good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, be good in school)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, is quality)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad for environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad for health)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be good in school)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be in class good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chewing gum, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(eating, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(eating, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(eating, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(gum, be bad for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(gum, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(gum, be in class good)