chewing gum: have calories

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings gum
Weight: 0.60
, eating apple
Weight: 0.33
, banana peel
Weight: 0.32
, eating
Weight: 0.32
, glue stick
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have calories 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, have calories)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(gum, have calories)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(chewing gum, have calories)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(gum, have calories)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(gum, have calories)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(chewing gum, have calories)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(chewing gum, have calories)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(chewing gum, have calories)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(chewing gum, have calories)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, have calories)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(chewing gum, have calories)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(chewing gum, have calories)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, have calories)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gum, have calories)