chewing gum: is harmful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings gum
Weight: 0.60
, eating apple
Weight: 0.33
, banana peel
Weight: 0.32
, eating
Weight: 0.32
, glue stick
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is harmful 1.00
be dangerous 0.79
is unhealthy 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(gum, is unhealthy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(chewing gum, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(gum, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(gum, is unhealthy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(chewing gum, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(chewing gum, is harmful)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(chewing gum, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(chewing gum, be dangerous)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(chewing gum, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(chewing gum, is unhealthy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(chewing gum, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be dangerous)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(chewing gum, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, be dangerous)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(chewing gum, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(chewing gum, is unhealthy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(chewing gum, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, is unhealthy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(chewing gum, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be dangerous)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(chewing gum, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, is unhealthy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(chewing gum, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(chewing gum, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, is harmful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(chewing gum, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(chewing gum, is harmful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(gum, is unhealthy)