chewing: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.56
, function
Weight: 0.52
, sound
Weight: 0.45
, problem
Weight: 0.43
, action
Weight: 0.42
Siblings eating
Weight: 0.33
, rubbing
Weight: 0.32
, smoking cigarette
Weight: 0.31
, swallowing
Weight: 0.31
, feeding
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
feel good 0.80
be good in school 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(eating, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(feeding, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(smoking cigarette, feel good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(swallowing, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(swallowing, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(smoking cigarette, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(rubbing, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rubbing, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(eating, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(eating, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(eating, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(swallowing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(swallowing, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(smoking cigarette, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(smoking cigarette, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(eating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(eating, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(rubbing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(rubbing, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(swallowing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(swallowing, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(feeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(feeding, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(rubbing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(rubbing, feel good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(smoking cigarette, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(smoking cigarette, feel good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(chewing, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(chewing, has quality bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(chewing, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(chewing, has quality bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(chewing, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(chewing, feel good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(chewing, feel good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(chewing, be good in school)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(chewing, feel good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(chewing, be good in school)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(chewing, be good in school)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(chewing, be good in school)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chewing, feel good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chewing, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(chewing, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(eating, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(smoking cigarette, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(eating, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(feeding, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(rubbing, feel good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(swallowing, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(smoking cigarette, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(swallowing, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(rubbing, has quality bad)