chi: is flat iron better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.49
, brand
Weight: 0.49
, city
Weight: 0.45
, conference
Weight: 0.44
, factor
Weight: 0.44
Siblings feng shui
Weight: 0.32
, yang
Weight: 0.31
, ping
Weight: 0.30
, meditation
Weight: 0.30
, chanel
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is flat iron better 1.00
is flat iron 0.97
is best flat iron 0.97
is iron better 0.92
is best iron 0.87
is iron 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(chi, is flat iron better)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(chi, is flat iron better)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(chi, is flat iron better)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(chi, is flat iron)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(chi, is flat iron better)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(chi, is flat iron)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(chi, is flat iron better)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(chi, is best flat iron)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(chi, is flat iron better)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(chi, is best flat iron)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(chi, is flat iron better)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chi, is flat iron)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(chi, is flat iron better)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(chi, is flat iron)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(chi, is flat iron better)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(chi, is iron)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(chi, is flat iron better)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(chi, is iron better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(chi, is flat iron better)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(chi, is best flat iron)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(chi, is flat iron better)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(chi, is best flat iron)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(chi, is flat iron better)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(chi, is iron)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(chi, is flat iron better)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(chi, is best iron)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(chi, is flat iron better)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(chi, is iron better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(chi, is flat iron better)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chi, is best iron)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(chi, is flat iron better)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chi, is iron)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(chi, is flat iron better)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(chi, is best iron)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(chi, is flat iron better)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(chi, is iron better)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(chi, is flat iron better)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(chi, is iron)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(chi, is flat iron better)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(chi, is iron better)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(chi, is flat iron better)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(chi, is best iron)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(chi, is flat iron better)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(chi, is flat iron better)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(chi, is flat iron better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(chi, is flat iron better)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(chi, is flat iron better)