chi: long qua hate bsj

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.49
, brand
Weight: 0.49
, city
Weight: 0.45
, conference
Weight: 0.44
, factor
Weight: 0.44
Siblings feng shui
Weight: 0.32
, yang
Weight: 0.31
, ping
Weight: 0.30
, meditation
Weight: 0.30
, chanel
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
long qua hate bsj 1.00
be long qua 0.97
be qua 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(chi, long qua hate bsj)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(chi, long qua hate bsj)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(chi, long qua hate bsj)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(chi, be long qua)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(chi, long qua hate bsj)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chi, be qua)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(chi, long qua hate bsj)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(chi, be long qua)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(chi, long qua hate bsj)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chi, be long qua)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(chi, long qua hate bsj)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(chi, be qua)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(chi, long qua hate bsj)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(chi, be qua)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(chi, long qua hate bsj)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(chi, be long qua)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(chi, long qua hate bsj)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(chi, be qua)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(chi, long qua hate bsj)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(chi, long qua hate bsj)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(chi, long qua hate bsj)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(chi, long qua hate bsj)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(chi, long qua hate bsj)