chicago: be bad place live

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents los angeles
Weight: 0.67
, atlanta
Weight: 0.67
, illinois
Weight: 0.63
, hot spot
Weight: 0.62
, detroit
Weight: 0.60
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.36
, seattle
Weight: 0.36
, ohio
Weight: 0.35
, miami
Weight: 0.35
, indiana
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad place live 1.00
be good place live 0.97
was such good place do 0.86
is horrible 0.76
have terrible food 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(los angeles, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chicago, be bad place live)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(atlanta, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chicago, be bad place live)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(illinois, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chicago, be bad place live)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(illinois, be good place live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(atlanta, be good place live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be good place live)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be good place live)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(atlanta, be good place live)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be good place live)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be good place live)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, be good place live)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(miami, be good place live)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is horrible)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be good place live)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(los angeles, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(chicago, be bad place live)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(atlanta, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(chicago, be bad place live)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(illinois, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(chicago, be bad place live)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(miami, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(miami, be good place live)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ohio, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(ohio, be good place live)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(las vegas, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(las vegas, be good place live)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(seattle, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(seattle, be good place live)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(indiana, is horrible)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(indiana, is horrible)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(chicago, be bad place live)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(chicago, was such good place do)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(chicago, was such good place do)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(chicago, was such good place do)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be bad place live)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chicago, be bad place live)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(illinois, be good place live)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(atlanta, be good place live)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(los angeles, be good place live)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(seattle, be good place live)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(las vegas, be good place live)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(miami, be good place live)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ohio, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(indiana, is horrible)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(illinois, be good place live)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(atlanta, be good place live)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(chicago, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(los angeles, be good place live)