chicago: be called second city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents los angeles
Weight: 0.67
, atlanta
Weight: 0.67
, illinois
Weight: 0.63
, hot spot
Weight: 0.62
, detroit
Weight: 0.60
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.36
, seattle
Weight: 0.36
, ohio
Weight: 0.35
, miami
Weight: 0.35
, indiana
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called second city 1.00
is second city 0.97
be known as second city 0.91
was called city 0.89
be called city 0.88
called city 0.87
was called black city 0.84
is city 0.84
be really called city 0.83
be called white city 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(los angeles, be called city)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chicago, be called second city)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(atlanta, is city)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chicago, be called second city)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(detroit, is city)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chicago, be called second city)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(los angeles, is city)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chicago, be called second city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be called city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(los angeles, is city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(detroit, is city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(atlanta, is city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(atlanta, is city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be called city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(detroit, is city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, is city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be called city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(miami, be called city)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is city)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(miami, is city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(los angeles, be called city)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(chicago, be called second city)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(atlanta, is city)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(chicago, be called second city)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(detroit, is city)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(chicago, be called second city)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(los angeles, is city)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(chicago, be called second city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(miami, is city)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(miami, is city)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(seattle, is city)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(seattle, is city)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(seattle, be called city)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(seattle, be called city)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(miami, be called city)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(miami, be called city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(chicago, be called second city)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chicago, is second city)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(chicago, is second city)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(chicago, is city)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was called city)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be called city)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(chicago, called city)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(chicago, be called city)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was called black city)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be called white city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(chicago, called city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(chicago, was called city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(chicago, is second city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chicago, is city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be really called city)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(chicago, is second city)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(chicago, is city)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(chicago, be called city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(chicago, be called city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(chicago, was called city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(chicago, called city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(chicago, called city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(chicago, was called city)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(chicago, is city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(chicago, be called white city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(chicago, was called black city)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(chicago, be really called city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(chicago, be really called city)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(chicago, be really called city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(chicago, was called black city)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(chicago, be called white city)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(chicago, was called black city)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(chicago, be called white city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be called second city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chicago, be called second city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(los angeles, is city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(los angeles, be called city)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(detroit, is city)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(atlanta, is city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(seattle, be called city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(miami, be called city)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(miami, is city)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(seattle, is city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(los angeles, be called city)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(los angeles, is city)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(detroit, is city)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(chicago, be called second city)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(atlanta, is city)