chicago: be in illinois

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents los angeles
Weight: 0.67
, atlanta
Weight: 0.67
, illinois
Weight: 0.63
, hot spot
Weight: 0.62
, detroit
Weight: 0.60
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.36
, seattle
Weight: 0.36
, ohio
Weight: 0.35
, miami
Weight: 0.35
, indiana
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in illinois 1.00
be important city in illinois 0.95
be biggest city in illinois 0.88
be called chicago 0.81
be named chicago 0.80
use chicago river 0.77
be far from oregon 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be far from oregon)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(chicago, be in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(ohio, be far from oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(ohio, be far from oregon)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(chicago, be in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(chicago, be in illinois)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(chicago, be in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be important city in illinois)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(chicago, be in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be biggest city in illinois)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(chicago, be in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(chicago, be called chicago)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(chicago, be in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chicago, use chicago river)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(chicago, be in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be called chicago)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(chicago, be in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be named chicago)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(chicago, be in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(chicago, be named chicago)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(chicago, be in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(chicago, be called chicago)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(chicago, be in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(chicago, be named chicago)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(chicago, be in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(chicago, use chicago river)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(chicago, be in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(chicago, be called chicago)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(chicago, be in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(chicago, use chicago river)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(chicago, be in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(chicago, be biggest city in illinois)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(chicago, be in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(chicago, be named chicago)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(chicago, be in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(chicago, use chicago river)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(chicago, be in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(chicago, be important city in illinois)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(chicago, be in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(chicago, be biggest city in illinois)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(chicago, be in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(chicago, be important city in illinois)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(chicago, be in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(chicago, be biggest city in illinois)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(chicago, be in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(chicago, be important city in illinois)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(chicago, be in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(chicago, be in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be in illinois)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(chicago, be in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(chicago, be in illinois)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(ohio, be far from oregon)