chicago: be locate in illinois

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents los angeles
Weight: 0.67
, atlanta
Weight: 0.67
, illinois
Weight: 0.63
, detroit
Weight: 0.60
, houston
Weight: 0.60
Siblings seattle
Weight: 0.36
, san jose
Weight: 0.35
, san diego
Weight: 0.34
, san francisco
Weight: 0.33
, san antonio
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be locate in illinois 1.00
be locate in north america 0.84
be at in michigan 0.80
be a part of michigan 0.79
be defined as large city in michigan 0.78
be a part of texas 0.78
be defined as name of city in california 0.77
be a part of california 0.76
be west of texas 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(detroit, be at in michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(chicago, be locate in illinois)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(detroit, be a part of michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(chicago, be locate in illinois)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(chicago, be locate in illinois)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(houston, be a part of texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(chicago, be locate in illinois)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(detroit, be defined as large city in michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(chicago, be locate in illinois)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(los angeles, be defined as name of city in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(chicago, be locate in illinois)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(detroit, be defined as large city in michigan)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be defined as name of city in california)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(detroit, be at in michigan)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(houston, be a part of texas)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(detroit, be a part of michigan)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be a part of california)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(detroit, be at in michigan)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(detroit, be a part of michigan)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(detroit, be defined as large city in michigan)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be a part of california)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be defined as name of city in california)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(houston, be a part of texas)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be a part of california)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be west of texas)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(san diego, be a part of california)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(san diego, be defined as name of city in california)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, be a part of texas)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(san jose, be a part of california)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(detroit, be at in michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(chicago, be locate in illinois)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(detroit, be a part of michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(chicago, be locate in illinois)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(houston, be a part of texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(chicago, be locate in illinois)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(detroit, be defined as large city in michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(chicago, be locate in illinois)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(chicago, be locate in illinois)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(los angeles, be defined as name of city in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(chicago, be locate in illinois)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(san diego, be defined as name of city in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(san diego, be defined as name of city in california)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(san antonio, be a part of texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(san antonio, be a part of texas)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(san jose, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(san jose, be a part of california)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(san diego, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(san diego, be a part of california)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(san francisco, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be a part of california)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(san francisco, be west of texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be west of texas)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(chicago, be locate in illinois)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(chicago, be locate in north america)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(chicago, be locate in north america)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be locate in north america)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(chicago, be locate in north america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(chicago, be locate in illinois)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(houston, be a part of texas)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(los angeles, be a part of california)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(detroit, be a part of michigan)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(detroit, be at in michigan)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(los angeles, be defined as name of city in california)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(detroit, be defined as large city in michigan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(san francisco, be west of texas)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(san antonio, be a part of texas)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(san diego, be a part of california)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(san jose, be a part of california)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(san francisco, be a part of california)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(san diego, be defined as name of city in california)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(houston, be a part of texas)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(los angeles, be a part of california)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(detroit, be a part of michigan)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(detroit, be at in michigan)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(los angeles, be defined as name of city in california)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(detroit, be defined as large city in michigan)