chicago: is bears

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents los angeles
Weight: 0.67
, atlanta
Weight: 0.67
, illinois
Weight: 0.63
, hot spot
Weight: 0.62
, detroit
Weight: 0.60
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.36
, seattle
Weight: 0.36
, ohio
Weight: 0.35
, miami
Weight: 0.35
, indiana
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bears 1.00
bears in nfc central 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(chicago, is bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(chicago, is bears)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(chicago, is bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(chicago, bears in nfc central)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(chicago, is bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(chicago, bears in nfc central)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(chicago, is bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(chicago, bears in nfc central)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(chicago, is bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(chicago, bears in nfc central)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(chicago, is bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(chicago, is bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(chicago, is bears)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(chicago, is bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(chicago, is bears)