chick: be fil a 's statements hate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.65
, thing
Weight: 0.61
, species
Weight: 0.58
, girl
Weight: 0.57
, dude
Weight: 0.57
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.36
, cougar
Weight: 0.36
, kitten
Weight: 0.35
, opossum
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be fil a 's statements hate 1.00
is fil bad 0.88
is fil 0.88
be fil good 0.88
is fil good 0.88
is fil popular 0.86
be fil best 0.86
is fil free 0.86
is fil open 0.86
is fil free today 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(chick, be fil a 's statements hate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(chick, be fil a 's statements hate)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(chick, be fil a 's statements hate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(chick, is fil)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(chick, be fil a 's statements hate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(chick, is fil)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(chick, be fil a 's statements hate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(chick, is fil)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(chick, be fil a 's statements hate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(chick, is fil)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(chick, be fil a 's statements hate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(chick, be fil best)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(chick, be fil a 's statements hate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(chick, be fil good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(chick, be fil a 's statements hate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(chick, be fil best)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(chick, be fil a 's statements hate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(chick, be fil good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(chick, be fil a 's statements hate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(chick, be fil best)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(chick, be fil a 's statements hate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chick, be fil good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(chick, be fil a 's statements hate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(chick, be fil best)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(chick, be fil a 's statements hate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(chick, be fil good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(chick, be fil a 's statements hate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(chick, be fil a 's statements hate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(chick, be fil a 's statements hate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(chick, be fil a 's statements hate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(chick, be fil a 's statements hate)