chicken hawk: is protected

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents danger
Weight: 0.48
Siblings tiger shark
Weight: 0.29
, fundamentalism
Weight: 0.28
, cannibal
Weight: 0.28
, concern
Weight: 0.28
, debris
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
is protected 1.00
protect themselves 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(chicken hawk, is protected)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, protect themselves)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(chicken hawk, is protected)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(tiger shark, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, protect themselves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(chicken hawk, is protected)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(chicken hawk, is protected)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(chicken hawk, is protected)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(chicken hawk, is protected)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(chicken hawk, is protected)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(chicken hawk, is protected)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(chicken hawk, is protected)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(chicken hawk, is protected)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tiger shark, protect themselves)