chicken: be considered meat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.68
, pet
Weight: 0.66
, entree
Weight: 0.66
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
Siblings broiler
Weight: 0.53
, dark meat
Weight: 0.42
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38
, fried egg
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered meat 1.00
be in meat 0.95
be called meat 0.95
is meat 0.95
be considered dangerous meat 0.95
have meat 0.94
be considered most dangerous meat 0.93
is white meat 0.90
have light meat 0.90
is red meat 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(dark meat, be called meat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(chicken, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(dark meat, be called meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(dark meat, be called meat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(chicken, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(chicken, be considered meat)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(chicken, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(chicken, is meat)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(chicken, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(chicken, is meat)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(chicken, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(chicken, is meat)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(chicken, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(chicken, have meat)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(chicken, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(chicken, have meat)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(chicken, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(chicken, have meat)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(chicken, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(chicken, be called meat)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(chicken, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(chicken, is red meat)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(chicken, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be called meat)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(chicken, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(chicken, be called meat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(chicken, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(chicken, be in meat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(chicken, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(chicken, be in meat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(chicken, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(chicken, be in meat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(chicken, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chicken, have meat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(chicken, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(chicken, is meat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(chicken, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(chicken, is red meat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(chicken, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(chicken, be called meat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(chicken, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be in meat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(chicken, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(chicken, is red meat)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(chicken, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(chicken, is red meat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(chicken, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(chicken, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be considered meat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(chicken, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(chicken, be considered meat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(dark meat, be called meat)