chicken: be healthier than beef

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.68
, pet
Weight: 0.66
, entree
Weight: 0.66
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
Siblings broiler
Weight: 0.53
, dark meat
Weight: 0.42
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38
, fried egg
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be healthier than beef 1.00
be better than beef 0.94
be healthier than pork 0.93
be cheaper than beef 0.91
more is expensive than beef 0.91
be better than meat 0.89
more is expensive than beef at burger places 0.86
be better than red meat 0.85
digest than beef 0.84
be better than chicken 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(chicken, be healthier than beef)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(chicken, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(meat, be better than chicken)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than chicken)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chicken, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(chicken, be healthier than beef)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(chicken, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(chicken, be healthier than beef)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(chicken, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(chicken, digest than beef)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(chicken, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(chicken, digest than beef)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chicken, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(chicken, digest than beef)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(chicken, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(chicken, digest than beef)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(chicken, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chicken, be healthier than pork)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(chicken, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(chicken, be better than meat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(chicken, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(chicken, be healthier than pork)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chicken, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be healthier than pork)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(chicken, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(chicken, be healthier than pork)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(chicken, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(chicken, be better than meat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chicken, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be better than red meat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(chicken, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chicken, be better than red meat)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(chicken, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(chicken, be better than red meat)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(chicken, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(chicken, be better than red meat)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(chicken, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(chicken, be better than meat)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chicken, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be better than meat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(chicken, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(chicken, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be healthier than beef)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(chicken, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(chicken, be healthier than beef)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(meat, be better than chicken)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(chicken, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(meat, be better than chicken)