chicken: is food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.68
, pet
Weight: 0.66
, entree
Weight: 0.66
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
Siblings broiler
Weight: 0.53
, dark meat
Weight: 0.42
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38
, fried egg
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is food 1.00
get food 0.95
need food 0.93
find food 0.89
be such important source of food 0.81
is high risk food 0.81
be more satiating than vegetarian food 0.81
be more satiating than food 0.79
be inefficient food produce 0.78
be allowed in food preparation areas 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(meat, is high risk food)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(chicken, is food)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(meat, be more satiating than vegetarian food)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(chicken, is food)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(meat, be more satiating than food)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(chicken, is food)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(meat, be inefficient food produce)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(chicken, is food)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(pet, be allowed in food preparation areas)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(chicken, is food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(pet, be allowed in food preparation areas)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(meat, be inefficient food produce)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(meat, be more satiating than vegetarian food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(meat, be more satiating than food)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(meat, is high risk food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pet, be allowed in food preparation areas)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(meat, be inefficient food produce)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meat, be more satiating than vegetarian food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(meat, is high risk food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(meat, be more satiating than food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(meat, is high risk food)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(chicken, is food)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(meat, be more satiating than vegetarian food)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(chicken, is food)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(meat, be more satiating than food)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(chicken, is food)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(meat, be inefficient food produce)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(chicken, is food)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(pet, be allowed in food preparation areas)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(chicken, is food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(chicken, is food)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chicken, get food)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chicken, need food)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chicken, find food)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(chicken, get food)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be such important source of food)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(chicken, get food)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(chicken, need food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(chicken, get food)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(chicken, find food)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(chicken, find food)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(chicken, need food)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(chicken, need food)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(chicken, be such important source of food)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chicken, find food)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chicken, be such important source of food)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(chicken, be such important source of food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chicken, is food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(chicken, is food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(meat, be more satiating than food)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(meat, be more satiating than vegetarian food)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(meat, be inefficient food produce)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(pet, be allowed in food preparation areas)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(meat, is high risk food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(meat, be more satiating than food)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(meat, be more satiating than vegetarian food)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(meat, be inefficient food produce)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(pet, be allowed in food preparation areas)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(chicken, is food)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(meat, is high risk food)