chicken: need food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.68
, pet
Weight: 0.66
, entree
Weight: 0.66
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
Siblings broiler
Weight: 0.53
, dark meat
Weight: 0.42
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38
, fried egg
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
need food 1.00
get food 0.93
is food 0.93
find food 0.87
be such important source of food 0.82
is high risk food 0.80
be allowed in food preparation areas 0.80
need water survive 0.80
need more care 0.78
be inefficient food produce 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(meat, is high risk food)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(chicken, need food)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pet, need more care)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(chicken, need food)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(pet, be allowed in food preparation areas)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(chicken, need food)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(meat, be inefficient food produce)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(chicken, need food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(pet, be allowed in food preparation areas)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(meat, be inefficient food produce)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(meat, is high risk food)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(pet, need more care)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pet, be allowed in food preparation areas)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(meat, be inefficient food produce)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(meat, is high risk food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(pet, need more care)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(meat, is high risk food)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(chicken, need food)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(pet, be allowed in food preparation areas)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(chicken, need food)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pet, need more care)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(chicken, need food)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(meat, be inefficient food produce)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(chicken, need food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(chicken, need food)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chicken, get food)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chicken, is food)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chicken, find food)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(chicken, is food)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(chicken, get food)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(chicken, is food)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(chicken, get food)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be such important source of food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(chicken, is food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(chicken, find food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(chicken, get food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(chicken, be such important source of food)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(chicken, find food)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chicken, find food)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chicken, be such important source of food)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(chicken, be such important source of food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chicken, need food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(chicken, need food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(pet, be allowed in food preparation areas)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(meat, be inefficient food produce)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(meat, is high risk food)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(pet, need more care)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(pet, be allowed in food preparation areas)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(meat, be inefficient food produce)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(meat, is high risk food)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(chicken, need food)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(pet, need more care)