chief: was looking famous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents officer
Weight: 0.68
, member
Weight: 0.65
, position
Weight: 0.62
, head
Weight: 0.62
Siblings police officer
Weight: 0.38
, vice president
Weight: 0.38
, chairman
Weight: 0.37
, director
Weight: 0.36
, deputy
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was looking famous 1.00
was looking glass famous 0.90
be famous powhatan 0.82
was famous little crow 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(chief, was looking famous)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(chief, was looking famous)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(chief, was looking famous)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chief, was looking glass famous)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(chief, was looking famous)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(chief, was looking glass famous)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(chief, was looking famous)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chief, be famous powhatan)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(chief, was looking famous)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(chief, be famous powhatan)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(chief, was looking famous)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(chief, was looking glass famous)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(chief, was looking famous)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chief, was famous little crow)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(chief, was looking famous)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(chief, was looking glass famous)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(chief, was looking famous)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(chief, was famous little crow)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(chief, was looking famous)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(chief, be famous powhatan)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(chief, was looking famous)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(chief, was famous little crow)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(chief, was looking famous)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(chief, be famous powhatan)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(chief, was looking famous)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(chief, was famous little crow)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(chief, was looking famous)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chief, was looking famous)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(chief, was looking famous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(chief, was looking famous)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chief, was looking famous)