chiefs: wear shoes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents team
Weight: 0.54
, officer
Weight: 0.46
, most people
Weight: 0.42
, life
Weight: 0.40
Siblings police officer
Weight: 0.32
, staff
Weight: 0.32
, chief
Weight: 0.31
, football team
Weight: 0.30
, commander
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear shoes 1.00
wear brown shoes 0.96
wear khakis 0.81
wear turtlenecks 0.79
wear on red 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chiefs, wear shoes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(chiefs, wear shoes)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(chiefs, wear shoes)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(chiefs, wear brown shoes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(chiefs, wear shoes)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chiefs, wear khakis)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(chiefs, wear shoes)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(chiefs, wear brown shoes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(chiefs, wear shoes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(chiefs, wear khakis)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(chiefs, wear shoes)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(chiefs, wear khakis)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chiefs, wear shoes)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(chiefs, wear khakis)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(chiefs, wear shoes)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(chiefs, wear turtlenecks)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(chiefs, wear shoes)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chiefs, wear turtlenecks)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chiefs, wear shoes)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(chiefs, wear brown shoes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(chiefs, wear shoes)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(chiefs, wear on red)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(chiefs, wear shoes)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(chiefs, wear on red)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chiefs, wear shoes)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(chiefs, wear turtlenecks)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(chiefs, wear shoes)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(chiefs, wear brown shoes)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chiefs, wear shoes)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(chiefs, wear on red)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(chiefs, wear shoes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(chiefs, wear turtlenecks)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(chiefs, wear shoes)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(chiefs, wear on red)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(chiefs, wear shoes)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(chiefs, wear shoes)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(chiefs, wear shoes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chiefs, wear shoes)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(chiefs, wear shoes)