child molester: is attractive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents murderer
Weight: 0.69
, criminal
Weight: 0.68
, predator
Weight: 0.66
, pedophile
Weight: 0.58
Siblings catholic priest
Weight: 0.66
, rapist
Weight: 0.34
, cougar
Weight: 0.34
, owl
Weight: 0.34
, drug addict
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is attractive 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(murderer, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(child molester, is attractive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(child molester, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(murderer, is attractive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(child molester, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(murderer, is attractive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(child molester, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(cougar, is attractive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(murderer, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(child molester, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(child molester, is attractive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(child molester, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(cougar, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cougar, is attractive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(child molester, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(child molester, is attractive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(child molester, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(child molester, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(child molester, is attractive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(child molester, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(child molester, is attractive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(child molester, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(murderer, is attractive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(child molester, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cougar, is attractive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(child molester, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(murderer, is attractive)