child neglect: is social problem

Related concepts

Parents	charge Weight: 0.65 , parent Weight: 0.63 , problem Weight: 0.57 , concern Weight: 0.57 , crime Weight: 0.56
Siblings	mental health problem Weight: 0.34 , cruelty Weight: 0.34 , negligence Weight: 0.34 , first degree murder Weight: 0.33 , sexual harassment Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is social problem	1.00
has state problem	0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(crime, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(child neglect, is social problem)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(crime, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(child neglect, is social problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(child neglect, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(crime, is social problem)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(child neglect, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(crime, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(child neglect, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(crime, is social problem)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(child neglect, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(crime, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(child neglect, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has state problem)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(child neglect, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(crime, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(child neglect, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(child neglect, is social problem)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(crime, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(child neglect, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(child neglect, is social problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(child neglect, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, is social problem)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(child neglect, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(child neglect, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(child neglect, is social problem)

Similarity expansion

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(child neglect, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(child neglect, has state problem)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(child neglect, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(child neglect, has state problem)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(child neglect, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(child neglect, has state problem)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(child neglect, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(child neglect, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(child neglect, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(child neglect, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(child neglect, is social problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(child neglect, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(child neglect, is social problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(child neglect, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(crime, is social problem)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(child neglect, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(child neglect, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is social problem)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(child neglect, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(child neglect, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(crime, is social problem)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(child neglect, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)