child: wants to candy

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents boy
Weight: 0.66
, girl
Weight: 0.66
, angel
Weight: 0.65
, toddler
Weight: 0.61
Siblings young person
Weight: 0.67
, boy scout
Weight: 0.67
, daughter
Weight: 0.65
, nurse
Weight: 0.65
, baby
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
wants to candy 1.00
wants to play with toy 0.77
wants to eat sweet 0.76
take cookie from jar 0.76
be at toy store 0.76
own toy 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(toddler, wants to play with toy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(child, wants to candy)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(girl, be at toy store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(child, wants to candy)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(boy, own toy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(child, wants to candy)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(boy, be at toy store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(child, wants to candy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(child, wants to candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(boy, be at toy store)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(child, wants to candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(girl, be at toy store)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(child, wants to candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(boy, own toy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(child, wants to candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(toddler, wants to play with toy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(child, wants to candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(toddler, wants to play with toy)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(child, wants to candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(girl, be at toy store)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(child, wants to candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(boy, be at toy store)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(child, wants to candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(boy, own toy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(child, wants to candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(baby, wants to play with toy)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(child, wants to candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(young person, wants to play with toy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(toddler, wants to play with toy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(child, wants to candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(child, wants to candy)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(girl, be at toy store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(child, wants to candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(child, wants to candy)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(boy, be at toy store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(child, wants to candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(child, wants to candy)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(boy, own toy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(child, wants to candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(child, wants to candy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(child, wants to candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(young person, wants to play with toy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(young person, wants to play with toy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(child, wants to candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(baby, wants to play with toy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(baby, wants to play with toy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(child, wants to candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(child, wants to candy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(child, wants to candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(child, wants to candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(child, wants to candy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(child, wants to candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(child, wants to candy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(child, wants to candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(boy, own toy)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(child, wants to candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(girl, be at toy store)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(child, wants to candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(boy, be at toy store)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(child, wants to candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(toddler, wants to play with toy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(child, wants to candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(baby, wants to play with toy)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(child, wants to candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(young person, wants to play with toy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(child, wants to candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(girl, be at toy store)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(child, wants to candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(boy, own toy)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(child, wants to candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(boy, be at toy store)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(child, wants to candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(toddler, wants to play with toy)