chile: have disparity between wealthy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nation
Weight: 0.61
, economy
Weight: 0.60
, democracy
Weight: 0.60
, market
Weight: 0.59
, state
Weight: 0.58
Siblings jamaica
Weight: 0.32
, argentina
Weight: 0.32
, uruguay
Weight: 0.32
, mexico
Weight: 0.32
, california
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have disparity between wealthy 1.00
have large disparity between wealthy 0.99
have internal disparity between wealthy 0.97
have large internal disparity between wealthy 0.96
have disparity 0.92
have large disparity 0.92
have internal disparity 0.89
have large internal disparity 0.89
is wealthy 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(chile, have disparity between wealthy)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(chile, have large disparity between wealthy)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(chile, have internal disparity between wealthy)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(chile, have large disparity between wealthy)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(chile, have large internal disparity between wealthy)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(chile, have internal disparity between wealthy)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(chile, have disparity)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(chile, have large internal disparity between wealthy)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(chile, have disparity)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(chile, have large disparity between wealthy)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(chile, have large disparity)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(chile, have internal disparity between wealthy)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(chile, have large internal disparity between wealthy)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(chile, have disparity)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(chile, have large disparity)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(chile, have internal disparity)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(chile, have large internal disparity)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(chile, have internal disparity)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(chile, have large disparity)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(chile, have large internal disparity)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(chile, have internal disparity)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(chile, have large internal disparity)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(chile, have internal disparity between wealthy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(chile, is wealthy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(chile, have large internal disparity between wealthy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chile, have large disparity between wealthy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(chile, is wealthy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(chile, have disparity)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(chile, is wealthy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chile, have large disparity)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chile, have internal disparity)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chile, have large internal disparity)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chile, is wealthy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chile, have disparity between wealthy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chile, have disparity between wealthy)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(chile, have disparity between wealthy)