chile: is developed country

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nation
Weight: 0.61
, economy
Weight: 0.60
, democracy
Weight: 0.60
, market
Weight: 0.59
, state
Weight: 0.58
Siblings jamaica
Weight: 0.32
, argentina
Weight: 0.32
, uruguay
Weight: 0.32
, mexico
Weight: 0.32
, california
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is developed country 1.00
is developed 0.91
is more developed 0.89
is country 0.81
ranked among countries in world 0.76
is very diverse country 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(argentina, is country)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(jamaica, is country)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(uruguay, is country)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(mexico, is country)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(mexico, is country)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(mexico, is country)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(jamaica, is country)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(jamaica, is country)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(argentina, is country)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(argentina, is country)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(uruguay, is country)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(uruguay, is country)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(chile, is developed country)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(chile, is developed)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chile, is more developed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(chile, is developed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(chile, is developed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(chile, ranked among countries in world)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(chile, ranked among countries in world)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(chile, is more developed)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(chile, is developed)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(chile, is country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(chile, is country)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(chile, is more developed)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(chile, is more developed)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(chile, is country)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(chile, ranked among countries in world)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(chile, is very diverse country)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(chile, is country)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chile, ranked among countries in world)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(chile, is very diverse country)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(chile, is very diverse country)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(chile, is very diverse country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(chile, is developed country)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(chile, is developed country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(jamaica, is country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(argentina, is country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(uruguay, is country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(chile, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(mexico, is country)