chill: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents symptom
Weight: 0.55
, complaint
Weight: 0.54
, common cold
Weight: 0.52
, shock
Weight: 0.50
, heart attack
Weight: 0.49
Siblings bad breath
Weight: 0.31
, cramp
Weight: 0.31
, feeling
Weight: 0.31
, discomfort
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
has quality worse 0.87
has quality wrong 0.87
be bad with iud 0.86
get bad 0.83
be good 0.82
feel bad 0.80
be bad water 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(heart attack, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(chill, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(chill, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(shock, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(chill, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(shock, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(chill, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(complaint, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(chill, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(chill, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(complaint, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(chill, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(shock, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(complaint, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(heart attack, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(shock, has quality better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(shock, has quality worse)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(complaint, be good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(complaint, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(symptom, has quality worse)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(shock, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(heart attack, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shock, has quality better)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(shock, has quality worse)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(feeling, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(feeling, has quality wrong)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cramp, be bad with iud)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(cramp, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(bad breath, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(cramp, get bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(heart attack, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(chill, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(shock, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(chill, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(chill, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(shock, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(chill, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(chill, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(complaint, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(chill, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(complaint, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(chill, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(bad breath, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(bad breath, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(cramp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(cramp, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(feeling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(feeling, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(feeling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(feeling, has quality wrong)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cramp, be bad with iud) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(cramp, be bad with iud)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(cramp, get bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(cramp, get bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(chill, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chill, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(chill, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(shock, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(complaint, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(shock, has quality worse)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(heart attack, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(shock, has quality better)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(complaint, be good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(bad breath, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(feeling, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(cramp, get bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(feeling, has quality wrong)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(cramp, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(cramp, be bad with iud)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(shock, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(heart attack, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(complaint, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(shock, has quality better)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(shock, has quality worse)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(chill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(complaint, be good)