chimney: be in power stations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.64
, flue
Weight: 0.59
, wall
Weight: 0.56
, feature
Weight: 0.56
, site
Weight: 0.55
Siblings silo
Weight: 0.34
, eiffel tower
Weight: 0.33
, dome
Weight: 0.33
, fireplace
Weight: 0.33
, staircase
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in power stations 1.00
be at power plant 0.80
be at power plant big 0.79
be at nuclear power plant big 0.77
be at nuclear power plant 0.77
have electricity 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(wall, have electricity)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(chimney, be in power stations)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(chimney, be in power stations)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(wall, have electricity)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(chimney, be in power stations)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(wall, have electricity)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(wall, have electricity)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(chimney, be in power stations)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(chimney, be in power stations)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(chimney, be in power stations)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(chimney, be in power stations)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(chimney, be in power stations)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(chimney, be at nuclear power plant big)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(chimney, be in power stations)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(chimney, be at nuclear power plant big)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(chimney, be in power stations)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(chimney, be at nuclear power plant big)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(chimney, be in power stations)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chimney, be at nuclear power plant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(chimney, be in power stations)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(chimney, be at nuclear power plant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(chimney, be in power stations)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(chimney, be at nuclear power plant)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(chimney, be in power stations)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(chimney, be at power plant big)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(chimney, be in power stations)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(chimney, be at power plant big)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(chimney, be in power stations)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(chimney, be at power plant big)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(chimney, be in power stations)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(chimney, be at nuclear power plant big)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(chimney, be in power stations)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(chimney, be at nuclear power plant)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(chimney, be in power stations)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(chimney, be at power plant)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(chimney, be in power stations)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(chimney, be at power plant)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(chimney, be in power stations)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(chimney, be at power plant)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(chimney, be in power stations)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(chimney, be at power plant big)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(chimney, be in power stations)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(chimney, be at power plant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(chimney, be in power stations)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(chimney, be in power stations)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(chimney, be in power stations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(chimney, be in power stations)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(chimney, be in power stations)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(chimney, be in power stations)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(wall, have electricity)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(chimney, be in power stations)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(wall, have electricity)