chimpanzee: be in forest

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ape
Weight: 0.75
, great ape
Weight: 0.74
, creature
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.68
Siblings gorilla
Weight: 0.39
, orangutan
Weight: 0.38
, monkey
Weight: 0.37
, primate
Weight: 0.37
, rhino
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in forest 1.00
live in rainforest 0.80
live in rainforests 0.79
live in tropical rainforest 0.78
adapt to rainforest 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mammal, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(chimpanzee, be in forest)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(ape, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(chimpanzee, be in forest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(ape, live in rainforest)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(mammal, live in rainforest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ape, live in rainforest)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mammal, live in rainforest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(gorilla, live in rainforest)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(rhino, live in rainforest)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(gorilla, adapt to rainforest)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(monkey, adapt to rainforest)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(orangutan, live in rainforest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(orangutan, adapt to rainforest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mammal, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(chimpanzee, be in forest)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(ape, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(chimpanzee, be in forest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(gorilla, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(gorilla, live in rainforest)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(gorilla, adapt to rainforest)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(gorilla, adapt to rainforest)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(orangutan, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(orangutan, live in rainforest)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(orangutan, adapt to rainforest)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(orangutan, adapt to rainforest)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(monkey, adapt to rainforest)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(monkey, adapt to rainforest)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(rhino, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(rhino, live in rainforest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(chimpanzee, be in forest)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(chimpanzee, live in rainforests)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(chimpanzee, live in rainforests)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, live in rainforests)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, live in rainforest)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(chimpanzee, live in rainforest)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(chimpanzee, live in rainforest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(chimpanzee, adapt to rainforest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(chimpanzee, adapt to rainforest)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, adapt to rainforest)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(chimpanzee, live in rainforests)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(chimpanzee, live in rainforest)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(chimpanzee, adapt to rainforest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, be in forest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(chimpanzee, be in forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(ape, live in rainforest)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mammal, live in rainforest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(gorilla, live in rainforest)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(rhino, live in rainforest)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(gorilla, adapt to rainforest)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(orangutan, live in rainforest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(monkey, adapt to rainforest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(orangutan, adapt to rainforest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(ape, live in rainforest)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(chimpanzee, be in forest)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mammal, live in rainforest)