:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(primate, zoo)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(primate, is zoo)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(chimpanzee, zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(primate, zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(primate, zoo)
Salient implies Plausible
0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(chimpanzee, zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(chimpanzee, zoo)
Similarity expansion
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(chimpanzee, zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, is zoo)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(chimpanzee, zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(chimpanzee, zoo)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(primate, zoo)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(primate, is zoo)